Tie breaking
Posted by humblik on 2004-10-08 14:28:54
World-readable
That principle is essentially what we use now. We just do it on a more complicated level. ;-) Having just a yes/no vote makes ties too easy, which is one of the nice things about the current method, the likelihood of getting a tie is almost zero.I'm curious if people think my idea would be a good system of voting. What are it's downsides?
Round Two (2004-10-07 21:14:06)
- New voting scheme idea (humblik at 2004-10-08 11:05:37)
- Voting (Zan Lynx at 2004-10-08 12:02:06)
- Easy (Kiesa at 2004-10-08 13:11:51)
- Tie breaking (humblik at 2004-10-08 14:28:54)
- No (Yanthor at 2004-10-09 13:42:16)
- Maybe later then (humblik at 2004-10-12 10:50:23)
- Contract (Jäger at 2004-10-08 18:41:31)
- First Right of Refusal (Jäger at 2004-10-13 18:47:18)
- Interesting.... (cg4l at 2004-10-19 13:23:05)
Whoa! Now we can always know exactly where we are at every
moment...and still have no clue what is going on.
- Willy, upon learning about Ted's GPS acquisition, 11 November 2003
moment...and still have no clue what is going on.
- Willy, upon learning about Ted's GPS acquisition, 11 November 2003
